Automotive connector cross reference
Submit an OEM part number, competitor model, drawing, datasheet or sample photo. The review path helps compare connector structure, terminal matching, seal design, electrical requirements and application risk before quotation.
Important note
Cross reference is an engineering review process. Equivalent selection should be confirmed by drawings, samples, specifications and application testing before production use.
Start review
Enter a reference model for equivalent connector RFQ
This starter helps route TE, Molex, Aptiv, Yazaki, Sumitomo, Amphenol or OEM model references into the correct RFQ path.
Enter a brand, model or reference part number. The RFQ will be routed as an equivalent connector review and should include photos, drawings, pin count, wire size and application.
Brand reference library
Common equivalent connector reference sources
These brand references are handled as review paths, not automatic one-to-one replacements.
TE / AMP
cavity layout, latch, terminal family, seal, wire range and mating part
Molex
pin count, pitch, latch direction, current rating and harness compatibility
Aptiv / Delphi
sealed housing, terminal series, CPA/TPA lock and IP requirement
Yazaki / Sumitomo
harness fit, keying, terminal retention, mating connector and production sample
Amphenol / HV connector
high-voltage safety, HVIL, cable sealing, current path and validation risk
Equivalent pages
Brand-specific equivalent review pages
These pages capture buyers who search by competitor brand, part reference or equivalent connector requirement.
TE / AMP Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Submit TE or AMP automotive connector references for housing, terminal, seal, latch, cavity layout and application review.
Open Review PageMolex Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Review Molex automotive connector equivalents by series, part number, pitch, latch direction, terminal and harness application.
Open Review PageAptiv / Delphi Sealed Connector Equivalent Review
Review Aptiv or Delphi sealed automotive connector alternatives by terminal series, CPA/TPA lock, seal, wire size and harness environment.
Open Review PageYazaki Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Submit Yazaki connector references for equivalent review by housing, terminal, keying, latch, mating part and harness application.
Open Review PageSumitomo Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Review Sumitomo automotive connector alternatives for sensor, harness, lighting, engine bay and body electronics applications.
Open Review PageAmphenol Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Review Amphenol automotive connector alternatives by pin count, voltage, current, sealing, material and application requirement.
Open Review PageDeutsch Waterproof Connector Equivalent Review
Review Deutsch-style sealed connector alternatives for outdoor, truck, chassis, engine bay and harsh environment harness applications.
Open Review PageJST Automotive Connector Equivalent Review
Review JST-style compact automotive connector alternatives for electronics, sensors, lighting and small module applications.
Open Review PageReview process
How equivalent connector review works
A reliable cross reference path checks structure and application fit, not only product appearance.
Submit Reference
Send OEM part number, competitor model, drawing, photo or physical sample.
Compare Specification
Review pin count, cavity layout, terminal, seal, material and electrical requirement.
Confirm Risk
Check fit, locking structure, waterproof level, current rating and application environment.
Request Quote
Prepare recommended connector path, sample plan and quotation requirement.
Equivalent review is not only visual matching
Automotive connector alternatives must be checked against mechanical, electrical, sealing and application requirements before production use.
Same appearance does not guarantee same terminal, seal, material or current rating.
Connector replacement must confirm mating direction, latch, keying, wire range and crimp condition.
Waterproof alternatives must be reviewed with seal size, wire outer diameter and IP test condition.
EV and high-voltage alternatives need safety, cable size, HVIL and validation review before quotation.
Final use should be confirmed by sample fit, drawing check and application testing.
Reference examples
Common cross reference request paths
These examples show how brand or model references can be routed into connector families and RFQ requirements.
TE / AMP equivalent
housing, terminal, seal and drawing comparison
Automotive Connectors / Wire Harness Connectors
part number, photo, datasheet or sample
Molex equivalent
cavity layout, latch direction, terminal and current review
Automotive Connectors / Terminals
model number, pin count and application
Aptiv / Delphi equivalent
sealed housing, terminal series and harness compatibility
Waterproof Connectors / Wire Harness Connectors
connector photo, wire size and IP requirement
Amphenol / EV connector equivalent
high-voltage safety, current, IP rating and cable size review
EV Connectors / High Voltage Connectors
voltage, current, drawing and project stage
Information needed for cross reference review
Complete reference information helps reduce wrong matches and makes the quotation review faster.
Original part number or brand reference
Product photo, drawing, datasheet or physical sample
Pin count, wire size, voltage, current and IP rating
Vehicle system, application environment and annual demand
Need for housing, terminal, seal, plug, socket or full connector kit
FAQ
Cross reference questions
Equivalent connector review should be handled carefully because appearance alone is not enough for automotive applications.
Can you provide an exact replacement for TE, Molex or Aptiv connectors?
Cross reference is an engineering review process. Equivalent selection should be confirmed by part number, drawing, sample, terminal, seal, electrical requirement and application testing.
What information is needed for connector cross reference review?
Provide original part number, photos, drawing or datasheet, pin count, wire size, voltage, current, IP rating, application and quantity requirement.
Need equivalent connector review?
Send the reference model, photo, drawing or sample information. The RFQ path will collect the details needed for engineering review.